
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Observer at Boston CollegeKevin Keegan | The Observer at Boston College</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebcobserver.com/author/kevin-keegan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebcobserver.com</link>
	<description>There is no Freedom without the Truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sustainability</title>
		<link>http://www.thebcobserver.com/2009/10/06/sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebcobserver.com/2009/10/06/sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Keegan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10/6/09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebcobserver.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Sustainability” has become somewhat of a buzzword these days. Like many popular movements, its direction has been steered by some who look to gain from the movement. One need only to walk through an Urban Outfitters location to see such a process in action. There is no doubt that some who are trying to and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Sustainability” has become somewhat of a buzzword these days. Like many popular movements, its direction has been steered by some who look to gain from the movement. One need only to walk through an Urban Outfitters location to see such a process in action. There is no doubt that some who are trying to and will co-opt sustainability and use its momentum to benefit themselves. Perhaps the idea of sustainability is still somewhat nebulous in the minds of some, and because they don’t understand it completely, they become weary of it and reject it. An examination of the word and our history as a species may help us to understand the philosophy behind the movement.</p>
<p>To be sustainable is to be able to endure. Travel back a few thousand years to before the advent of the catalytic converter, the steam engine, or agriculture to when humans were mainly hunter-gathers. During that time period humans were a nomadic bunch, following herds and gathering what they could from the flora around them. Human populations at this time were relatively low, and we made a negligible impact on Earth. We were engaged in a sustainable relationship with nature.</p>
<p>Time went forward. We began to settle as we developed agriculture and began to domesticate animals. Early on, our forms of agriculture and animal farming were fairly sustainable. We planted multiple crops which complemented each other ecologically, and we took advantage of the web of life to produce our meat: Sun and rain grow the grasses and legumes, cows eat the grasses and legumes, chickens clean up after the cows, what’s leftover enhances soil fertility, etc.</p>
<p>As time went on we strayed from the natural order of symbiotic relationships that nature has developed so perfectly. We began to monocrop, and manufacture fertilizer with the use of not solar energy, but the energy from finite fossil fuels. This pattern of straying from the natural order continued with a few hints of the environmental degradation which could and would come: see Cuyahoga River.</p>
<p>In time, we realized that the Earth was not an inexhaustible reservoir of resources for our use. We began to set aside particularly beautiful areas of the country as protected areas. Soon we had a vibrant national park system. We began to see the effect man-made pollution had on our water and air so we enacted the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act in the 1970s. We began to understand the importance of maintaining a diverse community of plant and animal species, so we enacted the Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p>These actions were all done in recognition that our previous way of life was not sustainable. As scientific research continued into the current century, we began to notice other ways in which we were living in an unsustainable manner. We realized that fossil fuels were finite, so we began to invest in solar and wind energy. We realized that the concentration of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere was increasing, which leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect. The list goes on.</p>
<p>The sustainability movement is a popular movement whose only goal is to improve the quality of life on Earth for all of us. It is easy to become shortsighted. To see those who serve to gain from the movement financially as the leaders and architects of the movement would be ignorant to the history of the movement. Superficially, sustainability may seem to inhibit our unbridled growth as individuals and as a society. We may not be able to cut costs as easily, but what costs are we cutting? Monetary costs, for sure. But what costs do we subsequently incur as a society when we all ignore the effects of our “cost cutting” measures on the environment? It would certainly be easier for General Electric, and cheaper, to dispose of their toxic waste directly into the Hudson River-and that is precisely what they did for a long time. Now they and we have realized what a flawed decision that was, and they are attempting to rid the river of the contaminants that they released into it.</p>
<p>Sustainability is a movement built on the recognition of how nature works, and that no matter how much we may think we have conquered nature, we will always owe our success and failure as a species to the environment that we live in. If we destroy our environment, we destroy ourselves. This fact is what compels and implores us to act to protect it. To sustain it. To do so we must understand the effects of our actions, however small or seemingly innocuous. There may be times when we have to make sacrifices in order to ensure the rich biodiversity that is slowly eroding, and to ensure a high quality of life for as many as possible. But we have made them before, and there is no reason why we can not continue to in our attempt to live more harmoniously with the world around us.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">“Sustainability” has become<br />
somewhat of a buzzword these<br />
days. Like many popular movements,<br />
its direction has been<br />
steered by some who look to gain<br />
from the movement. One need<br />
only to walk through an Urban<br />
Outfi tters location to see such<br />
a process in action. There is no<br />
doubt that some who are trying<br />
to and will co-opt sustainability<br />
and use its momentum to benefi t<br />
themselves. Perhaps the idea of<br />
sustainability is still somewhat<br />
nebulous in the minds of some,<br />
and because they don’t understand<br />
it completely, they become<br />
weary of it and reject it. An examination<br />
of the word and our<br />
history as a species may help us<br />
to understand the philosophy behind<br />
the movement.<br />
To be sustainable is to be<br />
able to endure. Travel back a<br />
few thousand years to before the<br />
advent of the catalytic converter,<br />
the steam engine, or agriculture<br />
to when humans were mainly<br />
hunter-gathers. During that time<br />
period humans were a nomadic<br />
bunch, following herds and gathering<br />
what they could from the<br />
fl ora around them. Human populations<br />
at this time were relatively<br />
low, and we made a negligible<br />
impact on Earth. We were engaged<br />
in a sustainable relationship<br />
with nature.<br />
Time went forward. We<br />
began to settle as we developed<br />
agriculture and began to domesticate<br />
animals. Early on, our forms<br />
of agriculture and animal farming<br />
were fairly sustainable. We planted<br />
multiple crops which complemented<br />
each other ecologically,<br />
and we took advantage of the web<br />
of life to produce our meat: Sun<br />
and rain grow the grasses and legumes,<br />
cows eat the grasses and<br />
legumes, chickens clean up after<br />
the cows, what’s leftover enhances<br />
soil fertility, etc.<br />
As time went on we strayed<br />
from the natural order of symbiotic<br />
relationships that nature<br />
has developed so perfectly. We<br />
began to monocrop, and manufacture<br />
fertilizer with the use of<br />
not solar energy, but the energy<br />
from fi nite fossil fuels. This pattern<br />
of straying from the natural<br />
order continued with a few hints<br />
of the environmental degradation<br />
which could and would come: see<br />
Cuyahoga River.<br />
In time, we realized that the<br />
Earth was not an inexhaustible<br />
reservoir of resources for our use.<br />
We began to set aside particularly<br />
beautiful areas of the country as<br />
protected areas. Soon we had a<br />
vibrant national park system. We<br />
began to see the effect man-made<br />
pollution had on our water and air<br />
so we enacted the Clean Air Act<br />
and the Clean Water Act in the<br />
1970s. We began to understand<br />
the importance of maintaining a<br />
diverse community of plant and<br />
animal species, so we enacted the<br />
Endangered Species Act.<br />
These actions were all done<br />
in recognition that our previous<br />
way of life was not sustainable.<br />
As scientifi c research continued<br />
into the current century, we began<br />
to notice other ways in which we<br />
were living in an unsustainable<br />
manner. We realized that fossil<br />
fuels were fi nite, so we began to<br />
invest in solar and wind energy.<br />
We realized that the concentration<br />
of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere<br />
was increasing, which<br />
leads to an enhanced greenhouse<br />
effect. The list goes on.<br />
The sustainability movement<br />
is a popular movement whose<br />
only goal is to improve the quality<br />
of life on Earth for all of us.<br />
It is easy to become shortsighted.<br />
To see those who serve to gain<br />
from the movement fi nancially<br />
as the leaders and architects of<br />
the movement would be ignorant<br />
to the history of the movement.<br />
Superfi cially, sustainability may<br />
seem to inhibit our unbridled<br />
growth as individuals and as a society.<br />
We may not be able to cut<br />
costs as easily, but what costs are<br />
we cutting? Monetary costs, for<br />
sure. But what costs do we subsequently<br />
incur as a society when<br />
we all ignore the effects of our<br />
“cost cutting” measures on the<br />
environment? It would certainly<br />
be easier for General Electric, and<br />
cheaper, to dispose of their toxic<br />
waste directly into the Hudson<br />
River-and that is precisely what<br />
they did for a long time. Now<br />
they and we have realized what<br />
a fl awed decision that was, and<br />
they are attempting to rid the river<br />
of the contaminants that they released<br />
into it.<br />
Sustainability is a movement<br />
built on the recognition of how<br />
nature works, and that no matter<br />
how much we may think we have<br />
conquered nature, we will always<br />
owe our success and failure as a<br />
species to the environment that<br />
we live in. If we destroy our environment,<br />
we destroy ourselves.<br />
This fact is what compels and<br />
implores us to act to protect it.<br />
To sustain it. To do so we must<br />
understand the effects of our actions,<br />
however small or seemingly<br />
innocuous. There may be<br />
times when we have to make sacrifi<br />
ces in order to ensure the rich<br />
biodiversity that is slowly eroding,<br />
and to ensure a high quality<br />
of life for as many as possible.<br />
But we have made them before,<br />
and there is no reason why we can<br />
not continue to in our attempt to<br />
live more harmoniously with the<br />
world around us.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebcobserver.com/2009/10/06/sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

