“Sustainability” has become somewhat of a buzzword these days. Like many popular movements, its direction has been steered by some who look to gain from the movement. One need only to walk through an Urban Outfitters location to see such a process in action. There is no doubt that some who are trying to and will co-opt sustainability and use its momentum to benefit themselves. Perhaps the idea of sustainability is still somewhat nebulous in the minds of some, and because they don’t understand it completely, they become weary of it and reject it. An examination of the word and our history as a species may help us to understand the philosophy behind the movement.
To be sustainable is to be able to endure. Travel back a few thousand years to before the advent of the catalytic converter, the steam engine, or agriculture to when humans were mainly hunter-gathers. During that time period humans were a nomadic bunch, following herds and gathering what they could from the flora around them. Human populations at this time were relatively low, and we made a negligible impact on Earth. We were engaged in a sustainable relationship with nature.
Time went forward. We began to settle as we developed agriculture and began to domesticate animals. Early on, our forms of agriculture and animal farming were fairly sustainable. We planted multiple crops which complemented each other ecologically, and we took advantage of the web of life to produce our meat: Sun and rain grow the grasses and legumes, cows eat the grasses and legumes, chickens clean up after the cows, what’s leftover enhances soil fertility, etc.
As time went on we strayed from the natural order of symbiotic relationships that nature has developed so perfectly. We began to monocrop, and manufacture fertilizer with the use of not solar energy, but the energy from finite fossil fuels. This pattern of straying from the natural order continued with a few hints of the environmental degradation which could and would come: see Cuyahoga River.
In time, we realized that the Earth was not an inexhaustible reservoir of resources for our use. We began to set aside particularly beautiful areas of the country as protected areas. Soon we had a vibrant national park system. We began to see the effect man-made pollution had on our water and air so we enacted the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act in the 1970s. We began to understand the importance of maintaining a diverse community of plant and animal species, so we enacted the Endangered Species Act.
These actions were all done in recognition that our previous way of life was not sustainable. As scientific research continued into the current century, we began to notice other ways in which we were living in an unsustainable manner. We realized that fossil fuels were finite, so we began to invest in solar and wind energy. We realized that the concentration of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere was increasing, which leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect. The list goes on.
The sustainability movement is a popular movement whose only goal is to improve the quality of life on Earth for all of us. It is easy to become shortsighted. To see those who serve to gain from the movement financially as the leaders and architects of the movement would be ignorant to the history of the movement. Superficially, sustainability may seem to inhibit our unbridled growth as individuals and as a society. We may not be able to cut costs as easily, but what costs are we cutting? Monetary costs, for sure. But what costs do we subsequently incur as a society when we all ignore the effects of our “cost cutting” measures on the environment? It would certainly be easier for General Electric, and cheaper, to dispose of their toxic waste directly into the Hudson River-and that is precisely what they did for a long time. Now they and we have realized what a flawed decision that was, and they are attempting to rid the river of the contaminants that they released into it.
Sustainability is a movement built on the recognition of how nature works, and that no matter how much we may think we have conquered nature, we will always owe our success and failure as a species to the environment that we live in. If we destroy our environment, we destroy ourselves. This fact is what compels and implores us to act to protect it. To sustain it. To do so we must understand the effects of our actions, however small or seemingly innocuous. There may be times when we have to make sacrifices in order to ensure the rich biodiversity that is slowly eroding, and to ensure a high quality of life for as many as possible. But we have made them before, and there is no reason why we can not continue to in our attempt to live more harmoniously with the world around us.
somewhat of a buzzword these
days. Like many popular movements,
its direction has been
steered by some who look to gain
from the movement. One need
only to walk through an Urban
Outfi tters location to see such
a process in action. There is no
doubt that some who are trying
to and will co-opt sustainability
and use its momentum to benefi t
themselves. Perhaps the idea of
sustainability is still somewhat
nebulous in the minds of some,
and because they don’t understand
it completely, they become
weary of it and reject it. An examination
of the word and our
history as a species may help us
to understand the philosophy behind
the movement.
To be sustainable is to be
able to endure. Travel back a
few thousand years to before the
advent of the catalytic converter,
the steam engine, or agriculture
to when humans were mainly
hunter-gathers. During that time
period humans were a nomadic
bunch, following herds and gathering
what they could from the
fl ora around them. Human populations
at this time were relatively
low, and we made a negligible
impact on Earth. We were engaged
in a sustainable relationship
with nature.
Time went forward. We
began to settle as we developed
agriculture and began to domesticate
animals. Early on, our forms
of agriculture and animal farming
were fairly sustainable. We planted
multiple crops which complemented
each other ecologically,
and we took advantage of the web
of life to produce our meat: Sun
and rain grow the grasses and legumes,
cows eat the grasses and
legumes, chickens clean up after
the cows, what’s leftover enhances
soil fertility, etc.
As time went on we strayed
from the natural order of symbiotic
relationships that nature
has developed so perfectly. We
began to monocrop, and manufacture
fertilizer with the use of
not solar energy, but the energy
from fi nite fossil fuels. This pattern
of straying from the natural
order continued with a few hints
of the environmental degradation
which could and would come: see
Cuyahoga River.
In time, we realized that the
Earth was not an inexhaustible
reservoir of resources for our use.
We began to set aside particularly
beautiful areas of the country as
protected areas. Soon we had a
vibrant national park system. We
began to see the effect man-made
pollution had on our water and air
so we enacted the Clean Air Act
and the Clean Water Act in the
1970s. We began to understand
the importance of maintaining a
diverse community of plant and
animal species, so we enacted the
Endangered Species Act.
These actions were all done
in recognition that our previous
way of life was not sustainable.
As scientifi c research continued
into the current century, we began
to notice other ways in which we
were living in an unsustainable
manner. We realized that fossil
fuels were fi nite, so we began to
invest in solar and wind energy.
We realized that the concentration
of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere
was increasing, which
leads to an enhanced greenhouse
effect. The list goes on.
The sustainability movement
is a popular movement whose
only goal is to improve the quality
of life on Earth for all of us.
It is easy to become shortsighted.
To see those who serve to gain
from the movement fi nancially
as the leaders and architects of
the movement would be ignorant
to the history of the movement.
Superfi cially, sustainability may
seem to inhibit our unbridled
growth as individuals and as a society.
We may not be able to cut
costs as easily, but what costs are
we cutting? Monetary costs, for
sure. But what costs do we subsequently
incur as a society when
we all ignore the effects of our
“cost cutting” measures on the
environment? It would certainly
be easier for General Electric, and
cheaper, to dispose of their toxic
waste directly into the Hudson
River-and that is precisely what
they did for a long time. Now
they and we have realized what
a fl awed decision that was, and
they are attempting to rid the river
of the contaminants that they released
into it.
Sustainability is a movement
built on the recognition of how
nature works, and that no matter
how much we may think we have
conquered nature, we will always
owe our success and failure as a
species to the environment that
we live in. If we destroy our environment,
we destroy ourselves.
This fact is what compels and
implores us to act to protect it.
To sustain it. To do so we must
understand the effects of our actions,
however small or seemingly
innocuous. There may be
times when we have to make sacrifi
ces in order to ensure the rich
biodiversity that is slowly eroding,
and to ensure a high quality
of life for as many as possible.
But we have made them before,
and there is no reason why we can
not continue to in our attempt to
live more harmoniously with the
world around us.





















